A few code snippets below for anyone else looking at this article:. Office Office Exchange Server. Not an IT pro? Resources for IT Professionals. Sign in. United States English. Ask a question. Quick access. Search related threads. Remove From My Forums. Answered by:. Archived Forums. N documents. You might be able to access a collection from the database using something like:. Stack Overflow for Teams — Collaborate and share knowledge with a private group. Create a free Team What is Teams?
Collectives on Stack Overflow. Learn more. Ask Question. Asked 7 years, 3 months ago. Active 7 years, 2 months ago. Viewed times. Is the eXist-saxon connection lacking with regard to the collection function?
Are there better ways of achieving what I want anyway? Improve this question. I have the impression that during all the chaotic testing that I did, I have never had a collection call that did not trigger this error. Given that collection seems to be a "non-standardized standard function", can you confirm that it should work in XSLT files that are applied by xquery transform:transform? No, sorry, I am not even an exist-db user, I was simply trying to point out inconsistencies between the two code samples.
I am sure someone else can tell you more about exist-db specific problems. For the doc function it will be a bit more simple, for this it is possible to serialize an eXist-db document to a bytestream which can be pickedup by saxon. Add a comment. Active Oldest Votes. You cannot use Collection to access a specific document. In your example you have: collection '.. You might be able to access a collection from the database using something like: collection '..
Improve this answer. Hence the "might be able to", I guess you are being bitten by this - github. Yes, probably. So I will continue with my hackish workaround for now.
0コメント